A study on legal and ethical basis for medical apology in Malaysia

When things go wrong during medical procedure, patients expect an explanation from medical practitioner of what happened. Patients have their rights to full disclosure following a medical error which it is also therapeutic in relieving their anxiety. A disclosure followed by an apology would most pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shahrir Ridha Shaharuddin (Author)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: Sungai Buloh, Selangor Universiti Teknologi MARA. Faculty of Medicine 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When things go wrong during medical procedure, patients expect an explanation from medical practitioner of what happened. Patients have their rights to full disclosure following a medical error which it is also therapeutic in relieving their anxiety. A disclosure followed by an apology would most probably bring positive outcome towards the disclosure process. An apology also helps to preserve the relationship which has been deteriorate between the medical practitioner and patient. However, in certain circumstances an apology made could be misinterpreted by the patient when it is made at a wrong time without properly well prepared. As a result, the apology made was used against medical practitioner as evidence of admission of fault in court. Thus, most of medical practitioner's fear to make an apology due to possible medical litigation. This has put medical practitioner in dilemma whether or not to make apology when things go wrong. In relation towards this issue, several jurisdictions like Canada, United States and Australia have enacted legislation on apology. The purpose of this apology laws is to provide protection towards those people who wish to convey the expression of sympathy through apology. In contrast towards Malaysia legal system, there was no specific legislation to protect medical practitioner in making apology. Thus, it raises a question whether a specific legislation is required like other jurisdiction in order to provide protection toward apology from being used as evidence in legal proceedings. This paper will discuss to what extend does apology is an admissible evidence in determining liability and the best way to implement medical apology according to Malaysia context
Item Description:UiTM Digitized
Physical Description:xi, 64 pages 30 cm
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references (page 58-63)