Diagnostic performance of different criteria and status of prothrombotic biomarkers in subjects with familial hypercholesterolaemia
Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have several diagnostic criteria including the Dutch Lipid Clinic Criteria (DLCC). However, the comparative diagnostic reference and association between these criteria have yet to be established. Furthermore, the literatures on the prothrombotic status of FH and diagnosed...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis Book |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sungai Buloh, Selangor
Universiti Teknologi MARA. Faculty of Medicine
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click Here to View Status and Holdings. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000#i 4501 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | wils-978996 | ||
005 | 202222810624 | ||
008 | 220328t20182018 MY df m#000 deng D | ||
040 | # | # | |a UiTM |c UiTM |e rda |
041 | 0 | # | |a English |
060 | 0 | 0 | |a WA 400 |
090 | 0 | 0 | |a WA400 |b R133d 2018 |
100 | 0 | # | |a Radzi Bin Rahmat |e author |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diagnostic performance of different criteria and status of prothrombotic biomarkers in subjects with familial hypercholesterolaemia |c Radzi Bin Rahmat |
264 | # | 1 | |a Sungai Buloh, Selangor |b Universiti Teknologi MARA. Faculty of Medicine |c 2018 |
264 | # | 4 | |c ©2018 |
300 | # | # | |a xvi, 143 pages |b illustrations (some color), charts |c 30 cm |
336 | # | # | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent |
337 | # | # | |a unmediated |b n |2 rdamedia |
338 | # | # | |a volume |b nc |2 rdacarrier |
500 | # | # | |a UiTM Digitized |
502 | # | # | |a Thesis (MSc.)--Universiti Teknologi MARA. Faculty of Medicine, 2018 |
504 | # | # | |a Includes bibliographical references (page 87-98) |
520 | # | # | |a Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have several diagnostic criteria including the Dutch Lipid Clinic Criteria (DLCC). However, the comparative diagnostic reference and association between these criteria have yet to be established. Furthermore, the literatures on the prothrombotic status of FH and diagnosed using the DLCC compared to related unaffected (RUC) and normal controls (NC) is scarce. In this study, the diagnostic performance evaluations of Simon Bromme's (SB) criteria, USMEDPED and Japanese FH Criteria against DLCC were done and association between DLCC FH subgroups with the criteria were analyzed along with investigation of prothrombogenic status in FH patients based on DLCC compared to RUC and NC. 415 modified DLCC positive FH subjects and 340 normal controls were tested with the three other criteria. In the biomarkers study, 120 FH, 68 RUC and 178 NC recruited and matched for age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, and hypertension. Blood samples were collected and analysed for the biomarkers. Correlation between LDL-c and the biomarkers were tested by using biomarker assays. All tested criteria showed comparable high specificity (99.4-98.8%). SB criteria showed highest sensitivity (51.1%) but USMEDPED showed lowest (25.3%). The prothrombotic biomarkers were higher in overall FH and definite FH compared to NC. There were correlation between prothrombogenic markers and LDL-c. In diagnosing FH, as alternative, SB criteria and JFHC preferred to be used as diagnostic criteria of FH. As the conclusion, along with FH, RUC group are at risk of developing thrombotic complication but less severe |
650 | 1 | 2 | |a Biomarkers |x administration and dosage |
650 | 2 | 2 | |a Thrombosis |
650 | 2 | 2 | |a Hypercholesterolemia |x therapy |
650 | 2 | 2 | |a Coronary Disease |x prevention & control |
710 | 2 | # | |a Faculty of Medicine |e issuing body |
856 | 4 | 0 | |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings. |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=978996 |
998 | # | # | |a 00250##a006.2.2||00250##b006.2.2||00255##a006.2.2||00260##a006.2.2||00260##b006.2.2||00260##c006.2.2||00264#1a006.2.2||00264#1b006.2.2||00300##a006.2.2||00300##b006.2.2||00300##c006.2.2||00500##a006.2.2||00502##a006.2.2||00520##a006.2.2||00520##b006.2.2||00538##a006.2.2||00546##a006.2.2||00730##a006.2.2||00730##d006.4||00730##f006.10||00730##n006.2.2||00730##p006.2.2|| |