The Institutional Imperative The Politics of Equitable Development in Southeast Asia

Why do some countries in the developing world achieve growth with equity, while others do not? If democracy is the supposed panacea for the developing world, why have Southeast Asian democracies had such uneven results? In exploring these questions, political scientist Erik Martinez Kuhonta argues t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kuhonta, Erik Martinez 1973 (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Stanford, California Stanford University Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000#i 4501
001 wils-938885
005 2019225152029
008 190913s2011 -US #g# ##001 ##eng#D
020 # # |a 9780804786881  |q paperback 
040 # # |a UiTM  |b eng  |c UiTM  |e rda 
090 0 0 |a HC441  |b .K84 2011 
100 1 # |a Kuhonta, Erik Martinez  |d 1973  |e author 
245 1 4 |a The Institutional Imperative  |b The Politics of Equitable Development in Southeast Asia  |c Erik Martinez Kuhonta 
264 # 1 |a Stanford, California  |b Stanford University Press  |c 2011 
264 # 4 |c ©2011 
300 # # |a xxii, 342 pages  |c 23 cm 
336 # # |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |2 rdacarrier 
520 # # |a Why do some countries in the developing world achieve growth with equity, while others do not? If democracy is the supposed panacea for the developing world, why have Southeast Asian democracies had such uneven results? In exploring these questions, political scientist Erik Martinez Kuhonta argues that the realization of equitable development hinges heavily on strong institutions, particularly institutionalized political parties and cohesive interventionist states, and on moderate policy and ideology.The Institutional Imperative is framed as a structured and focused comparative-historical analysis of the politics of inequality in Malaysia and Thailand, but also includes comparisons with the Philippines and Vietnam. It shows how Malaysia and Vietnam have had the requisite institutional capacity and power to advance equitable development, while Thailand and the Philippines, because of weaker institutions, have not achieved the same levels of success. At its core, the book makes a forceful claim for the need for institutional power and institutional capacity to alleviate structural inequalities. 
526 0 # |a MC245  |b COM654  |5 MC 
526 0 # |a SARJANA MUDA KOMUNIKASI MASSA (KEPUJIAN) PENERBITAN  |b ASIAN POLITICS  |5 FAKULTI KOMUNIKASI DAN PENGAJIAN MEDIA 
650 # 0 |a Social policy 
650 # 0 |a Southeast Asia 
650 # 0 |a Politics and government 
650 # 0 |a Economic development 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=938885 
998 # # |a 00264#1a002.8.2||00264#1b002.8.4||00300##a003.4.1||00300##b003.6.1||00300##c003.5.1||00520##a007.2||00520##b007.2||