The philosophy of evidence-based medicine

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a required element of clinical practice, but it is critical for the healthcare community to understand the ongoing controversy surrounding EBM. Seeking to address questions raised by critics, The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine challenges the over depen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Howick, Jeremy (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Chichester, West Sussex, UK Wiley-Blackwell/BMJ Books 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000#i 4501
001 wils-457940
005 202102285936
008 210122t2011 -UK a #001 deng D
020 # # |a 9781405196673  |q paperback 
020 # # |a 140519667X  |q paperback 
040 # # |a DNLM  |c DNLM  |d UiTM  |e rda 
041 0 # |a English 
060 0 0 |a WB 102.5 
090 0 0 |a WB102.5  |b H861p 2011 
100 1 # |a Howick, Jeremy  |e author 
245 1 4 |a The philosophy of evidence-based medicine  |c Jeremy Howick ; foreword by Paul Glasziou 
264 # 1 |a Chichester, West Sussex, UK  |b Wiley-Blackwell/BMJ Books  |c 2011 
264 # 4 |c ©2011 
300 # # |a xiv, 229 pages  |b illustrations  |c 22 cm 
336 # # |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
504 # # |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
505 0 # |a The philosophy of evidence-based medicine -- What is EBM? -- What is good evidence for a clinical decision? -- Ruling out plausible rival hypotheses and confounding factors : a method -- Resolving the paradox of effectiveness : when do observational studies offer the same degree of evidential support as randomized trials? -- Questioning double blinding as a universal methodological virtue of clinical trials : resolving the Philip's paradox -- Placebo controls : problematic and misleading baseline measures of effectiveness -- Questioning the methodological superiority of "placebo" over "active" controlled trials -- Examining the paradox that traditional roles for mechanistic reasoning and expert -- Judgment have been up-ended by EBM -- A qualified defence of the EBM stance on mechanistic reasoning -- Knowledge that versus knowledge how : situating the EBM position on expert clinical judgment -- Moving EBM forward. 
520 # # |a Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a required element of clinical practice, but it is critical for the healthcare community to understand the ongoing controversy surrounding EBM. Seeking to address questions raised by critics, The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine challenges the over dependency of EBM on randomized controlled trials. This book also explores EBM methodology and its relationship with other approaches used in medicine 
650 1 2 |a Evidence-Based Medicine 
650 2 2 |a Philosophy, Medical 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=457940 
964 # # |c BOK  |d MD 
998 # # |a 00264#1a006.2.2||00264#1b006.2.2||00300##a006.2.2||00300##b006.2.2||00300##c006.2.2||00520##a006.2.2||00520##b006.2.2||