Democratisation, governance, and regionalism in east and southeast Asia a comparative study

This new collection of essays compares the development of central institutions of governance in the emerging democracies of East and South East Asia. Seven key countries are covered: Taiwan, Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Save for Singapore and Malaysia, all hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Marsh, Ian
Format: Unknown
Language:English
Published: London Routledge 2006
Series:Routledge/Warwick studies in globalisation
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000n a2200000 a 4501
001 wils-360371
005 201942212817
008 t2006 -UK ag| |#001 #deng#D
020 # # |a 0415376238  |q hardback 
020 # # |a 9780415376235 
040 # # |a DLC  |d ITMB  |e rda 
041 0 # |a eng 
090 0 0 |a JQ750.A58  |b D46 2006 
245 0 0 |a Democratisation, governance, and regionalism in east and southeast Asia  |b a comparative study  |c edited by Ian Marsh 
264 # 1 |a London  |b Routledge  |c 2006 
300 # # |a xiii, 273 pages  |b illustration  |c 24 cm 
336 # # |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 # |a Routledge/Warwick studies in globalisation 
504 # # |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
520 # # |a This new collection of essays compares the development of central institutions of governance in the emerging democracies of East and South East Asia. Seven key countries are covered: Taiwan, Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Save for Singapore and Malaysia, all have democratized over the past decade. Because of its constitutive implications for citizen identities, democratization is arguably of even greater potential significance than the economic take-off that preceded it. But there are distinctive features that give the experience of these seven states especial relevance. First, unlike analogous western patterns, democratic transitions in Asia have been top-down in character. Second, the implementation of basic democratic forms was highly compressed in time. Third there were (and are), in most countries, no major ideological or programmatic cleavages. Thus the bases around which contending political forces might organize are not immediately clear. This may affect the outlook for partisanship and mobilization. There has been no synoptic, comparative study of these developments on a region-wide scale. This book fills the gap extremely well. 
650 # 0 |a Comparative government  |x Cross-cultural studies  |z Southeast Asia 
650 # 0 |a Democratization  |x Cross-cultural studies  |z Southeast Asia 
650 # 0 |a Democratization  |x Cross-cultural studies  |z East Asia 
650 # 0 |a Regionalism  |x Cross-cultural studies  |z Southeast Asia 
650 # 0 |a Regionalism  |x Cross-cultural studies  |z East Asia 
651 # 1 |a Southeast Asia  |x Politics and government  |y 1945- 
651 # # |a East Asia  |x Politics and government  |y 1945- 
700 1 # |a Marsh, Ian 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=360371 
964 # # |c BOK  |d 01 
998 # # |a 00264#1a002.8.2||00264#1b002.8.4||00300##a003.4.1||00300##b003.6.1||00300##c003.5.1||00520##a007.2||00520##b007.2||