Interpreting epidemiologic evidence strategies for study design and analysis

Evaluating the strength or persuasiveness of epidemiologic evidence is inherently challenging, both for those new to the field and for experienced researchers. There is a myriad of potential biases to consider, but little guidance about how to assess the likely impact on study results. This book off...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Savitz, David A. (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000#i 4501
001 wils-343180
005 202274104529
008 220804t20032003XXK a# #001 deng D
020 # # |a 9780195108408  |q hardback 
020 # # |a 019510840X  |q hardback 
040 # # |a DNLM  |d UiTM  |e rda 
041 0 # |a English 
060 0 0 |a WA 950 
090 0 0 |a WA950  |b S267i 2003 
100 1 # |a Savitz, David A.  |e author 
245 1 0 |a Interpreting epidemiologic evidence  |b strategies for study design and analysis  |c David A. Savitz 
264 # 1 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2003 
264 # 4 |c ©2003 
300 # # |a xi, 321 pages  |b illustrations  |c 24 cm 
336 # # |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
504 # # |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
520 # # |a Evaluating the strength or persuasiveness of epidemiologic evidence is inherently challenging, both for those new to the field and for experienced researchers. There is a myriad of potential biases to consider, but little guidance about how to assess the likely impact on study results. This book offers a strategy for assessing epidemiologic research findings, explicitly describing the goals and products of epidemiologic research in order to better evaluate its successes and limitations. The focus throughout is on practical tools for making optimal use of available data to assess whether hypothesised biases are operative and to anticipate concerns at the point of study design in order to ensure that needed information is generated. Specific tools for assessing the presence and impact of selection bias in both cohort and case-control studies, bias from non-response, confounding, exposure measurement error, disease measurement error, and random error are identified and evaluated. The potential value of each approach as well as its limitations are discussed, using examples from the published literature. Such information should help those who generate and interpret epidemiologic research to apply methodological principles more effectively to substantive issues, leading to a more accurate appraisal of the current evidence and greater clarity about research needs 
650 1 2 |a Epidemiologic Research Design 
650 2 2 |a Bias 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=343180 
964 # # |c BOK  |d 01 
998 # # |a 00264#1a006.2.2||00264#1b006.2.2||00300##a006.2.2||00300##b006.2.2||00300##c006.2.2||00520##a006.2.2||00520##b006.2.2||