SCIENCE AS POWER Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society

Science, argues stanley Aronowitz has established itself as not merely the dominant but the only legitimate form of human knowledge. By linking its truth claims to methodology, science has claimed independence from the influence of social and historical conditions. Science is therefore seen as an a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aronowitz, Stanley (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: London Macmillan Press 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000#i 4501
001 wils-245577
005 2021125172010
008 210225s1988 -UK 001 eng D
020 # # |a 0333475461  |q hardback 
020 # # |a 9780333475461  |q hardback 
020 # # |a 033347547X  |q paperback 
040 # # |a UiTM  |b eng  |c UiTM  |e rda 
041 0 # |a eng 
090 0 0 |a Q185.5  |b A76 1988 
100 1 # |a Aronowitz, Stanley  |e author 
245 1 1 |a SCIENCE AS POWER  |b Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society  |c Stanley Aronowitz 
264 # 1 |a London  |b Macmillan Press  |c 1988 
264 # 4 |c ©1988 
300 # # |a 385 pages  |b illustrations  |c 24 cm 
336 # # |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |2 rdacarrier 
500 # # |a Includes index 
520 # # |a Science, argues stanley Aronowitz has established itself as not merely the dominant but the only legitimate form of human knowledge. By linking its truth claims to methodology, science has claimed independence from the influence of social and historical conditions. Science is therefore seen as an authority beyond critique, whose norms and values are neutral, self-evident, and absolute. In Science as Power, Aronowitz asserts that the norms of science are by no means self-evident and that science is best seen as a socially constructed discourse that legitimates its power by pre-senting itself as truth. Although he is sympathetic to those who criticize knowledge for the power it grants its possessors, or who condemn its sometimes destructive uses, Aronowitz focuses instead on the subtle triumph of the scientific dis-course itself. Even critical discussions of sci-ence emulate, consciously or not, its norms; tices known as the oppositional prac Marxism, by for example, have long been dominated science. He studies Marxism because it bac launched a critique of science; ultimately however, its critique endorses or leaves intact and unexamined its own claims to be a science 
650 # 0 |a Science 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=245577 
964 # # |c BOK  |d 01 
998 # # |a 00264#1a002.8.2||00264#1b002.8.4||00300##a003.4.1||00300##b003.6.1||00300##c003.5.1||00500##a002.17.2||00520##a007.2||00520##b007.2||