ASEAN-EEC trade in services

Trade in services has been pushed to the centre of the international stage recently. as the United States has made a determined attempt to include exchanges in services firmly in the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs (GATT) frame- work. But as in other areas, the GATT Ministerial Meeting held...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
Other Authors: Waelbroeck, Jean, Praet, Peter, Rieger, Hans Christoph
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Singapore ASEAN Economic Research Unit, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:Click Here to View Status and Holdings.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000#i 4501
001 wils-037742
005 2023417141651
008 230517t XXU ae# |#001 ##eng#D
020 # # |a 9971902923  |q paperback 
020 # # |a 9789971902926  |q paperback 
040 # # |a UiTM  |b eng  |c UiTM  |e rda 
041 0 # |a eng 
043 # # |a ew-----  |a as----- 
090 0 0 |a HD9987.S68  |b A84 1985 
245 1 1 |a ASEAN-EEC trade in services  |c edited by Jean Waelbroeck, Peter Praet, Hans Christoph Rieger 
260 # # |a Singapore  |b ASEAN Economic Research Unit, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies  |c 1985 
300 # # |a xi, 166 pages  |b illustrations  |c 24 cm 
336 # # |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a unmediated  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a volume  |2 rdacarrier 
504 # # |a Includes bibliographies. 
520 # # |a Trade in services has been pushed to the centre of the international stage recently. as the United States has made a determined attempt to include exchanges in services firmly in the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs (GATT) frame- work. But as in other areas, the GATT Ministerial Meeting held in November 1982 failed to agree even on the scope of a clear programme of study on this topic. To a large extent, this failure was the result of the extremely poor climate in which the meeting was held. The main trading partners - Japan, the United States and the European Community had just been enmeshed in a series of bitter trade disputes. Developed countries were experiencing the deepest recession since World War II, with no clear sign that the bottom had even been reached. It would have been surprising to reach agreement on a major programme of trade liberalization at such a time. There was another reason for the failure, and that was that the main trading countries were not sure what their interests were. The initiator of the proposal, the United States, was obviously best equipped among the negotiators from this point of view. But there are many gaps even in Washington's files. Both the European Community's and Japan's negotiators have had too many other irons in the fire recently to have had much time to delve into 
650 # 0 |a Service industries  |z European Economic Community countries 
650 # 0 |a Service industries  |z Asia, Southeastern 
651 # 1 |a Asia, Southeastern  |x Commerce  |z European Economic Community countries 
651 # # |a European Economic Community countries  |x Commerce sia, Southeastern 
700 1 # |a Waelbroeck, Jean 
700 # # |a Praet, Peter 
700 # # |a Rieger, Hans Christoph 
710 1 # |a Institute of Southeast Asian Studies  |c ASEAN Economic Research Unit 
856 4 0 |z Click Here to View Status and Holdings.  |u https://opac.uitm.edu.my/opac/detailsPage/detailsHome.jsp?tid=037742 
964 # # |c BOK  |d 01 
998 # # |a 00130##a006.2.2||00250##a002.5.2||00250##b002.5.3||00255##a007.25.3||00260##a002.8.2||00260##b002.8.4||00260##c002.7.6||00264#1a002.8.2||00264#1b002.8.4||00300##a003.4.1||00300##b003.6.1||00300##c003.5.1||00500##a002.17.2||00502##a007.9.2||00520##a007.2||00520##b007.2||00538##a003.16.9||00546##a006.11||01700##a0011.2.2||02700##a0011.2.2||00730##a006.2.2||00730##d006.4||00730##f006.10||00730##n006.2.2||00730##p006.2.2||